Perhaps I’m easy to catch, but I couldn’t help but notice the emphasis of teaching students “skills in context”
MGRPs, from both the book’s description and even in our short experience so far in doing one on our own. Hopefully I will be able to return to this in more detail later on in the week, but I found Powell and Davidson’s article to be a great example of the process and benefits explained by Allen. Removing the “meaningless” and “degrading” effects of treating students as passive recipients of information and knowledge
An interesting point is the difference between Allen’s interaction with parents and Powell and Davidson’s note about their less than ideal communication. This does highlight in a testimonial how important, and perhaps difficult, it is to allow parents to also play an active role through informing and involving them throughout. Powell and Davidson’s description of the low, three-parent turnout is discouraging to hear, especially given the high level of investment and excitement on the part of the students
Works Cited
Allen, C. A. (2001). The Multigenre Research Paper: Voice, Passion, and Discovery in Grades 4-6. (B. Varner, Ed.) Portsmouth, NH: Hinneman.
Powell, R., & Davidson, N. (2005). The Donut House: Real World Literacy in an Urban Kindergarten Classroom. Language Arts , 82 (5), 248-256.
Here's a tip to include parents: give them lots of notice! I worked a very flexible job, but we often got notices for events a day or two before they happened. I couldn't always find a sub in that time. For field trips, you need several weeks of notice. I know that hampers some folks' groove, but if you want parents to participate you have to give them lots of notice and tell them exactly what to expect or what you need them to do.
ReplyDeleteJust my two cents on the parent involvement issue.