Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Community Literacy Dig: Playing with Language

Monday morning I was a part of a team conducting a “literacy dig.” As an observation team it was our task to explore, discover and collect different uses of language and literacy in a specific location over the span of approximately one half hour. Our team selected a local playground.

My role was to observe and report moments of speech between people we observed at our location. In other words, my task was to describe how people were saying what to whom.

During the time we spent collecting data I noticed three main ways of communicating between three distinct groups of speakers. The first group of speakers I will be looking at are the children who were at play. The second group of speakers consists of parents, grand-parents and other supervisors on the grounds. The third group contains the members of our research team.

Children’s Communication

“Mommy!”

The most distinct and consistent utterance I observed from the children was the calling out for their mothers and, less frequently, their fathers. The call could be heard over the entire playground at almost any given point in time, spoken with a wide range of emotions.

The two most common uses of “mommy” and “daddy” were in either expressions of excitement or pain and fear. The first half-dozen or so of the “mommy-daddy” tokens were exclamations of delight.

“Mommy, I did it!”

“Hey mom! … I climbed up that thing!”

“Mommy, look at me!”


The second most common instances of what I am calling the “mommy-daddy” token were during moments of pain or frustration. One example of this was where a young boy, around two years old, was standing next to the swing of his choice. Unfortunately the swing hung to high for him, and he saw his swinging prospect depended entirely upon his mother’s participation. Instead walking over to get her attention, he repeatedly called “Mommy!” until she arrived.

Outside of the “mommy-daddy” speech tokens, the most notable language information from children was the consistent focus on the self. In every instance I recorded, the children spoke solely in reference to, in the benefit of and in the direction towards themselves. For instance, one child called out to a group of his newfound friends:

“Come over here guys – come over here!”

Another informed his dad that he was “gonna go up the BIG slide!” – the focus being on him and his goals – and later complained, “I’m hungry. When going down a slide, a child could often be heard saying, “Mommy, look at me!”

The most obvious instance occurred when a boy was seeking the attention of his mother, who was at that time busy caring for her other child who seemed to be in some pain. He was hoping to use some playground apparatus that required an adult’s help.

Boy: “Mom!”

Mother: “Yeah” (other child crying in the background).

Boy: “I need your help with this.”

Mother: “I don’t know about that.”

Boy: “I can not… I can not do this [task] now [without your help].”

[no response]

Boy: “Mom, you can help me do something now.”

Mother: “I can’t totally help you right this second…”

The egocentric nature of children’s speech was not that surprising. They are the center of their world (as are we all, at least perceptively) and are still developing not a fuller world context from which to speak.


Adult to Child Communication

I was intrigued by the speech of adults, especially when interacting with the children. Adults would speak to children in ways that acknowledged and affirmed their centeredness. This would usually be coupled with the adoption of their speech and vocabulary, notably the expected “mommy” and “daddy.”

“Hey John, wanna go over here to this one?”

“Wanna go climb? Wanna go climb?”


A Grandfather, while pushing granddaughter on a swing sang a playful, “Aah rigidigikiky-diky.”

Often, in a similarly understanding way, adults would respond to children’s stories and statements with simple “uh-huh” and “okay” fillers, seeming to simply acknowledge that the child had spoken while not addressing the speech content.

In addition to using child accessible language and acknowledging their speech, many of the adults gave children directions in the form of questions. Instead of speaking directly and saying, “Jenny, we are leaving in five minutes,” one father told his swinging daughter:

“Hey, we’re going in three minutes, okay?”

In another instance, a father seeking to encourage his daughter to go play in another area spoke a gentle:

“You wanna swing? You wanna swing next to her?”

The first of the final two uses of language between children and adults is where adults were directing children to a particular parent, saying things like:

“Your mommy is over here.”

“That’s a daddy job.”

It is interesting again to note that the adults used words like “mommy” and “daddy,” where normal adult speech does not include these words with the same frequency.

The last use of adult to child language was in the form of reprimand, speaking in bold declaratives to attract the attention and obedience of the children.

“That’s enough, Jimmy!”


Adult to Adult Communication

The last use of language on the playground transpired in interactions between adults. Almost all speech in this context revolved around the children or child related ideas or activities. For instance, in one interaction, two grandparents were discussing a swing set:

Grandfather: “You go ahead and push

Grandmother: “Why they would put slick seats on swings, I just don’t know…”

[moments later the child nearly fell from her swing, being steadied by the grandfather]

Grandfather: “[I’m] glad I listened to you, for once!”

Finally, I captured a moment when one of the members of our research team was asking permission to photograph a child. She used language that was very different from the informal, child-like language and was more proper and deferential.

“Excuse me – I’m doing a project for class and I was wondering if I could take a picture.”

All in all I found that language use at this playground was largely informal and child-centered. With few exceptions adults would use language accessible to children when speaking to and (often) about them. Above all, the cry “mommy,” is the constant and ringing theme of the our morning’s playground music.

8 comments:

  1. Art - nicely done. Isn't it so strange that we don't notice how me-centered children are until we spend some time listening to them. I think that is probably one of the greatest challenges in teaching kids - building in them a balance between self-confidence & self-protection and community or group directed thinking. Very interesting to see how obvious it is on a playground.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And now we all know why mothers everyone occasionally think about changing their names from "mommy" to something else!

    Seriously, that's a great observation. A playground is a child-centered place, so I would expect most of the language to be centered on the children.

    ReplyDelete
  3. it is all about the kids at a playground so there would be very little adult-to-adult conversation to begin with and if there was a lot of conversation, it would relate to the kids!

    i would have never noticed how adults also use "mommy" and "daddy" in speaking to their kids except for when they are in trouble, then it changes to "what would your mother say?" or your father is going to hear about this!"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Language is so fascinating! You've noticed that speech is only one part of what's going on. Audience matters, as you recorded in the informal, almost telegraphic language between family members. The context fills in much of the meaning so that when we write speech down on paper it seems quite stripped down.

    So....is writing just speech written down on paper?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ms. Wohlwned, I would say that writing is not just transcribing speech down on paper. Speech written on paper really only exists in very specific, often academic, contexts (such as in linguistic research) and is often incomprehensible to readers. When we speak, we use generalities to refer to things in time and space in our immediate or personal contexts that are not contained in our words, speak with extensive filler sounds, stutters, starts and restarts, and with what would be considered a wide-range ungrammaticalities. Writing, at least in its traditional sense, is a completely different animal with different rules and conventions which, in turn, often sound stiff and clunky when spoken.

    Further, I would say that writing extends beyond writing on paper as well. The obvious example to the point would be our blog posts and the use of "book-machines" like the Amazon's "Kindle." To extend further back in history, with the fear of being overly thorough, much writing has been done on a number of different materials form parchments to stones.

    In addition and returning to our more immediate time, you have alluded to less formal writing on other devices, such as texting on cell phones. I think that you are correct in your suggestion. I have had frequent conversations with a high school teacher in Newark, NJ and she has described how her students, who are perennially behind in all their subject areas, may be able to text their papers faster than they could type them. I found this an intriguing idea (especially as I am a rather clumsy texter), and was even more drawn in when I gathered that, had she the means, she would actually consider allowing them to submit papers via text – even if only first drafts.

    The benefit, naturally, would be drawing out the students already developed ability to communicate in written language. They are able to emote and explain complex ideas and life situations, often with the aide of T9 (which I use extensively). However, the drawback is that “text-talk” is deeply diverged from standard written English and is unintelligible to many readers – especially those who are not fluent in the language of the highly adaptable texting world. This is not to make a value judgment on this kind of writing, but rather to mention one of its weaknesses – inaccessibility. As a teacher, it seems reasonable and appropriate to meet students where they have texting skills and then help them to extend those to write standard American English (if you prefer). Texting certainly can provide some basic, though often technically complicated skills, but I believe these should be a baseline from which to develop further their writing skills.

    I would be interested in learning more about your thoughts concerning texting as a writing form and if you know of any resources which address this topic.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Language does seem to be a reflection of our independence. I would be curious to know how much language is egocentric in an average dorm, workplace, or retirement home. I imagine it actually wouldn't be entirely different than our experience at a park - being part of a community consists largely of voicing our needs to others who can help us in some capacity.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I do agree that it is likely to find that much of our language use is egocentric. However, in most settings, if one were to talk only or almost entirely in reference to himself or herself, they would be either avoided or reprimanded. Being part of a community is "largely voicing our needs," but not to the exclusion of asking after the needs of others.

    I would also agree that there are many "adult" contexts where this would be totally acceptable. It would be rather odd, for instance, if patients in a hospital would be expected to ask the nurse how they are feeling.

    Just for fun, I've included a clip of one of my favorite comedians who adds some humor to the point of egocentricity. Enjoy :)

    Brian Regan (comedian), jokes of a "me monster."
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QvSoRQrVJg&feature=related

    ReplyDelete
  8. Study Article Found: The Egocentric Basis of Language Use

    http://psychology.uchicago.edu/people/faculty/keysar/12_keysarbarrhorton.pdf

    Super-cliff's notes: Language is processed egocentrically in adults, as in children, but is then tailored for the audience through "developed... strategies of adjustment."

    ReplyDelete